Bill O'Reilly Removed from NCMEC Speaker Gig

Bill O'Reilly's execrable statements made shortly after the recovery of Shawn Hornbeck and Ben Ownby have come back to haunt him again. After O'Reilly's statements, Keith Olbermann pointed out the fact that O'Reilly was scheduled to be the keynote speaker for a fundraising event held by the Florida branch of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.

Today, the following announcement was posted on the NCMEC website:

In response to the numerous e-mails and inquiries we have received, we are providing the following update regarding the Collier County, Florida branch fundraising dinner scheduled for March 9, 2007 in Naples, Florida. Bill O’Reilly, host of The O’Reilly Factor, will not be a speaker at the dinner. The dinner will be held as scheduled. John Walsh, host of America’s Most Wanted, will be the keynote speaker.

We would like to thank everyone for their comments and e-mails.
I was actually preparing a different blog entry when I received an e-mail about this announcement.

A man named Dan McCormick set up an online petition to request that the NCMEC remove O'Reilly as the scheduled speaker, which I signed. My intent with the planned blog entry was to direct more readers to the petition, but now it looks as though it may no longer be needed.

The NCMEC deserves kudos for doing the right thing. John Walsh is an appropriate choice to speak to an organization devoted to the cause of bringing missing children home again.

I wish I could shake hands with all the good people who flooded the NCMEC with those comments and e-mails. You've made a difference. Now I am beginning to feel as though Shawn Hornbeck may finally be getting a fair break in the public dialogue.

It's about time.

UPDATE, 2/10/07, 4:39 p.m. ET

If you live in the St. Louis area, I should tell you that I'm scheduled to be a guest tonight on The Jaco Report on MyFox St. Louis. I'm supposed to be on between 5:30 and 5:45 CT. See you then!

Goodbye, Vicky Lynn...

The news is breaking right now on most cable news channels and online: Anna Nicole Smith collapsed at the Hard Rock Hotel and Casino in Hollywood, Florida around 1:30 p.m. ET.

In fact, on MSNBC Rita Cosby is reporting that Anna Nicole Smith, born Vicky Lynn Hogan in November, 1967 in Houston, Texas, is dead. The confirmation came from Anna Nicole's attorney in a phone interview with Rita.

With her at the time was her former attorney and husband, Howard K. Stern, and a bodyguard.

Just after Anna Nicole gave birth to a baby girl in the Bahamas last September, her son Daniel, age 20, passed away under strange circumstances. Circumstances that are still unclear. Howard K. Stern was there when Daniel died, too.

Howard K. Stern is a very unlucky man.

The truth is, Anna Nicole may have been her own worst enemy. Yo-yo dieting, drug use, extreme pressure from negative publicity coming at her from a hundred different directions... maybe her heart gave out.

If she'd been plain old Vicky Lynn still in Houston and she'd lost her son and then died like this months later, just a housewife or workaday woman, that new husband would be subject to much open suspicion. I wonder if that will be the case now.

"Anna Nicole Smith's romantic partner, longtime lawyer and alleged father of her infant daughter provided her son with one of the drugs that killed him — then tried to cover it up by flushing the remaining pills down the toilet, a report says.

"The charges surfaced Monday as Bahamian officials agreed to conduct a formal inquest into the death of 20-year-old Daniel Smith in his mother's hospital room there in September, sources told the celebrity Web site TMZ.com..."
A version of this blog entry was first published at my personal weblog.

The Seminole County (Fla) police are investigating Anna Nicole Smith's death, and the medical examiner will make a determination as to cause. Initial reports are that it was a "cardiac event." It appears to be a death investigation, though, and not a criminal investigation.

I Need Suggestions

My wife Dana has suggested I open a question I have up to the readers of this blog.

Since she's awesome and usually right, I will.

Recently, I got Huff's Crime Blog and CrimeBlog.US back online, and with Dana's help fixed both blogs a bit to try and ensure -- hopefully -- less downtime in the future.

The blog you are reading at the moment has started off with a bang, and is currently the most popular weblog in visitors per day of any I've ever created. If you've followed my blogging for some time, you know that's not a small thing.

To me, this blog's popularity has also been kind of counter-intuitive. I mean, I got standalone URLs because I figured that was a way establish my blog's unique identity. To go back to a service like blogger and have my most well-read crime blog yet (at least in the first month of existence) has blown my mind.

Now that the two "original" blogs (my true original crime blog, The Dark Side, is no longer online -- all the content is at Huff's Crime Blog) are back up and running, I have a dilemma.

Dana and several readers have, in their different ways, made the point to me that to switch Web addresses too much is, to use my wife's word, "flighty."

My dilemma is this: Due to goals I have as a writer, and due to there only being so many hours in a day, I can't possibly keep all three blogs running at top speed, much less update a couple of other neglected blogs I have and like.

I like the blog you are reading right now a great deal. I'm happy with a good number of the newer posts, made since I moved here, and to be frank, I'm happy with having unwittingly "branded" this blog. When I decided to call it The True Crime Blog, I thought I was being lazy. Turns out no one else had done precisely that -- as far as I know -- and the title of this weblog is apparently very easy to remember and latch onto. I'm finding some people easily know you're talking about this weblog if someone else writes or says "The True Crime Blog."

At Huff's Crime Blog I have archives going back to the end of 2004. CrimeBlog.US is not just authored by me, but by several other bloggers now, and I am the editor.

I feel very strongly now the need to make my daily blogging be at one memorable place. I'm asking the reader's assistance, and the assistance of my fellow bloggers to figure out which blog that should be.

I've had a number of ideas: one is to leave Huff's Crime Blog alone. Let it stand as an archive, and become a less frequent contributor to CrimeBlog.US, while still maintaining editorial control. The weblog you are reading at the moment would then be the place you check for any new entries about breaking news or updates on older cases.

Another idea I had was to move all Huff's Crime Blog and CrimeBlog.US posts to another address and keep the contributors, allowing that new blog to stand as one big archive, with updates mostly by contributors. That, however, would be more moving around. Every time I've moved around, I've lost a few readers, and I don't like that.

So I ask you, the reader -- what would make the most sense? In the end, the decision is mine, of course, but your input is pretty important. You can either click the link on the top right and e-mail me or leave a comment. If you have yet another suggestion not referenced above, please offer it up.

For now, new blog updates will be here, though -- I'm making no changes until I feel I've heard from a good number of people.

Thank you in advance, and thank you, as always, for reading.

Love(?) Among the Astronauts


Lisa Marie Nowak, a 43-year-old astronaut and married mother of 3, drove nearly a thousand miles from Texas to Florida to meet the 1 a.m. flight of a woman she apparently viewed as a romantic rival.

After Nowak arrived in Orlando, things got weird.

The former mission specialist wore a trench coat and wig. Also found in Nowak's possession were a knife, BB gun, and rubber gloves. Nowak reportedly told police that the adult diapers they found in her vehicle were there so she could drive the 12+ hours to Florida without stopping to go to the restroom. She'd applied her training as an astronaut, since shuttle crews wear adult diapers on re-entry to the Earth's atmosphere.

Tonight Lisa Marie Nowak sits in a jail cell in Orange County, Florida. She faces multiple charges, among them are attempted kidnapping and battery. The crew member from a Space Shuttle Discovery flight made in the summer of 2006 is being held without bail.

It was the middle of the night when U.S. Air Force Capt. Colleen Shipman finally got her luggage and was able to leave Orlando National Airport. As Shipman headed for her car she realized she was being followed by a woman in a trench coat.

Police reports indicated that as Shipman reached her car in long-term parking she heard someone running. It was the stranger in the trench coat. The woman tried to open Shipman's car door, then she asked if she could use Shipman's cell.

Colleen Shipman told the woman that if she really needed help, she would call someone for her. The woman said she couldn't hear, and appeared upset.

Shipman rolled down her window, and that's when the "chemical spray" came into play -- in Ms. Shipman's face.

Colleen Shipman then managed to get away and alert the authorities.

In short order it was determined that the woman in the trench coat was Lisa Marie Nowak, and the problem here was another NASA astronaut named Bill Oefelein.

Lisa Nowak told cops that she had a relationship with Oefelein that was "more than a working relationship," but it wasn't a romantic relationship, either. Even so, when Nowak found out Oefelein and Colleen Shipman were somehow involved, she apparently decided she needed to go straight to Orlando from her home in Houston to "talk" with Ms. Shipman about that relationship.

In addition to the items like the knife and BB gun, cops later found a steel mallet, rubber tubing, and directions to Shipman's home -- all in Nowak's car parked at a nearby La Quinta Inn.

Nowak told the cops she didn't want to harm the other woman, just frighten her into talking about her relationship with Bill Oefelein. The police believe otherwise.

We don't romanticize astronauts the way we did in the heyday of the Apollo missions to the moon, but to some degree, they are still revered. And much has always been made of how difficult it is to become an astronaut. There are physical hardships to be endured, and mental, emotional stresses aplenty.

That this is perhaps the first time an astronaut has ever faced felony charges is probably testimony to how well NASA has weeded troubled people out of their astronaut training programs over the years.

For some people, it takes one thing to catalyze a certain kind of madness. People who have functioned at a high level all their lives -- and Lisa Nowak most certainly was one of those -- need only the wrong combination of nascent emotional problems and trigger events, and all may be lost. Something looks like love to them, and anything resembling sense simply vanishes.

In January, 2004, Lisa Nowak and Bill Oefelein participated in winter environmental training in in Quebec. With astronauts from the Canadian, European, and Russian Space Agencies, Nowak, Oefelein and another NASA astronaut, Dominic Antonelli, underwent training usually reserved for Canadian soldiers.

The goal was to focus on leadership and teamwork if any of the astronauts were ever assigned to the international space station. According to the Canadian Army website linked above, "the training was designed to test their physical, mental and psychological strength in a harsh environment and prepare them for a stint of four to six months aboard the international space station."

Did a relationship -- at least in Lisa Nowak's mind -- begin that January?

Often when I read about a crime in the news and there is some mention of bipolar disorder (also known as manic-depression), I shake my head because it is obvious that bipolar disorder has little to do with the crime in question. This is particularly true sometimes if the crime is violent. I am familiar with the vagaries of manic-depression because of my late brother, who struggled with it for most of his life. Being a performing artist helps, too, since manic-depressives are a dime a dozen in the performing arts.

There's been no mention of Lisa Nowak having any mental illness in this story, and there may never be one, but when I saw her haggard face in a mugshot and compared that to the attractive, all-American astronaut seen here, I had to wonder. I had to wonder if there was some sort of hitherto unknown problem bursting out in her obsessive and frightening behavior, or if there was drug abuse.

The idea that Nowak has been an astronaut, already gone into space, mitigated against drugs, as I'd think that drug-testing would be mandatory in such a program.

Maybe all work and no play made Lisa feel like a dull girl. From Lisa Nowak's pre-flight interview, posted at NASA's website in August, 2005:

You mentioned being so busy, not having time for those things. What about this job makes you willing to make the sacrifice of those personal things?

Well, you’re right, there’s not time for a lot of those and, and less time for family, of course, and this mission’s very important. All the space missions we do are very important because exploration’s important for all of us. But you’re right; it’s a sacrifice for our own personal time and our families and the people around us. But I do think it’s worth it because if you don’t explore and take risks and go do all these things then everything will stay the same. People aren’t like that. We want to explore and expand and know more about the place around us.
I added the bold emphasis in Lisa Nowak's answer. I've seen it happen with people I knew, before -- they become engrossed in a project with a co-worker. That project consumes more and more time and energy. The co-workers are together, and there is stress, but also a kind of thrill in the accomplishment. I saw this happen once and break up a marriage that had never before shown any signs of fracturing. The stress, whatever it was, made the two people feel more vital, alive, and the bonding seemed almost natural, at that point.

But the relationship that I observed was mutual. What no one knows yet, because he (understandably) has made no comment, is just what kind of relationship Bill Oefelein thought he had with fellow astronaut Lisa Nowak.

One thing seems sure to me now -- had Colleen Shipman not kept her wits about her, something worse than a face full of pepper spray could have happened.

The arrest of Lisa Marie Nowak proves the brittle humanity of even the best and brightest among us. Astronauts, to a kid who was two when man first walked on the moon, were demi-gods. Obviously, sometimes even an astronaut can crack.

At least this time it happened on Earth. I don't think there's a jail cell on the international space station, yet.

UPDATE, 12:04 p.m. ET

Lisa Nowak was almost released on bail. However, at the moment, CNN is reporting that Orlando police have added an attempted first-degree murder charge that will keep the astronaut behind bars.

Wow. What a gothic, strange story.

With diapers.

UPDATE, 12:42 p.m. ET

In January of 2005, this website was registered under the name Jane Caputo -- Lisa Nowak's mother. It is titled "Lisa's Launch," and apparently dedicated to Nowak's then-impending mission on the space shuttle Discovery. The site is a simple affair devoted to Lisa Nowak's role in the mission, and it would make sense if it was created by a proud parent.

The website for Lisa's Launch, which did take place in the summer of 2006, only seems to underscore Lisa's fall.

It's as if Icarus had been newly conceived, as a woman.

UPDATE, 3:53 p.m. ET

The Smoking Gun has the police affidavit for this case.

One of the most telling details: "Receipts found in Mrs. Nowak's bag indicate that she paid only cash in her travels from Houston to Orlando, including a stay at a hotel."

Thanks to Trench for posting this link at CrimeNews.

Mainstream media sources:

"Astronaut charged with kidnap attempt," CBS4Denver.com/AP, February 6, 2007.

"Space shuttle astronaut arrested at OIA on attempted kidnapping, battery charges," The Orlando Sentinel, February 5, 2007.

Huff's Crime Blog and CrimeBlog.US

Huff's Crime Blog and CrimeBlog.US are back up.

I can't begin to explain what had the blogs off-line for so long, as I'm not tech-savvy enough to know. My wife, who is the real Web guru between the two of us, believes my problem at both blogs was not heavy traffic, though I certainly had some, but spambots.

Either way, for the moment both are live and any entries made by myself or others are up and available.

I am considering consolidating all crime blog entries prior to the crash of those sites into one site and directing everyone there -- a big archive, essentially -- and having this be the active blog. I like the name of this blog and the fact that even with all the problems blogger can have, it still seems to be more reliable than having a unique URL hosted on a server. I've not worried about a big traffic onslaught at this URL once, and the idea of something like that at my other two weblogs made me nervous -- people would not be able to reach sites at the very moment a great number of readers would most like to.

There is an error on the sidebar at Huff's Crime Blog at the moment -- I'm working to correct it, but there's no need to e-mail me about it: I know.

New Charges Against Michael Devlin

Hopefully the announcement made in Missouri today that new charges have been filed against Michael Devlin, alleged kidnapper of Shawn Hornbeck and Ben Ownby, will quiet some of the idiocy spouted in the mainstream media and by at least one talking head, idiocy I've addressed in this blog. From the St. Louis Post-Dispatch:

... Devlin was charged with one count of kidnapping and 17 counts of forcible sodomy relating ot the abduction last month, and a second count of kidnapping and 52 more counts of forcible sodomy relating to the abduction in 2002. Each count carries a penalty of up to life in prison...
Just in case you don't get the point, here is a link to the actual complaint, sent to me by reader Pamela.

From that link:
That Michael J. Devlin, in violation of Section 565.110, RSMo, committed the class B felony of kidnapping, punishable upon conviction under Section 558.011, RSMo, in that between October 6th, 2002 and November 30th, 2002, the defendant unlawfully confined S.H. at 491 South Holmes, Apt. D, without his consent for a substantial period, for the purpose of facilitating the commission of the felony of forcible sodomy...
Of course, the man is innocent until proven guilty... but anyone with an ounce of sense, who has followed cases with any similarities, should not be surprised.

And there are some people who should be ashamed of the statements they've made publicly about this case. But I won't hold my breath.